SHILLERS: Why Paying Upfront is a Risky Move

Avacatx
3 min readAug 26, 2024

--

Elon Musk will shill $CATX one day

In the world of memetokens, getting your project noticed is key to success. But in the rush to gain attention, many projects make a critical mistake: paying “shillers” upfront to promote their tokens. At first glance, it seems like a surefire way to generate buzz, but this approach often leads to more harm than good. Let’s dive into why aligning incentives with long-term growth is far more beneficial.

The Scenario: Paying for Hype

Imagine a new meme crypto project, the team behind it decides to spend $50,000 on influencers to promote their token. Their goal? Create hype, build buzz, and drive up demand quickly. It sounds like a winning strategy, right? The influencers get paid, and in return, the project gets exposure. However, this strategy has some serious pitfalls.

The Hype and the Initial Spike

As expected, once the influencers start promoting the new memetoken, there’s a significant spike in interest. The price of the token surges as new investors, driven by FOMO, jump in. For a brief moment, everything seems to be going according to plan. The token is trending on the dex exchanges, and everyone’s talking about it. But here’s where things start to go wrong.

The Problem: No Skin in the Game

The influencers have already been paid upfront. Their job is done, and they’ve fulfilled their obligation to promote the coin. However, because they don’t have any personal stake in the project’s success beyond their payment, their commitment ends there. They move on to the next project, leaving the coin to fend for itself.

The Aftermath: Hype Dies, Price Drops

As the influencers stop promoting, the hype around he coin fades quickly. The price, which had surged during the promotional period, begins to plummet. Investors who got in during the peak start to panic-sell, causing the price to drop even further. What was meant to be a strategy for growth turns into a disaster.

Alternative Approach: Incentivizing Shillers to Invest

Now, let’s imagine a different scenario. Instead of paying influencers upfront, the team encourages them to invest in the project themselves. By having skin in the game, these influencers become more than just paid promoters — they become true believers in the project’s success.

The Power of Aligned Incentives

When influencers invest their own money, they are naturally more inclined to genuinely support and promote the project over the long term. They have a direct financial interest in seeing the project succeed, which leads to more authentic and sustained promotion. This helps build a strong community around the project, driving real demand instead of just temporary hype.

The Takeaway: Growth vs. Hype

The lesson here is clear: while paying shillers upfront might create a quick pump, it’s not a sustainable strategy. Projects should focus on aligning incentives, getting influencers to invest in the project and grow with it. This not only ensures more committed promotion but also contributes to long-term, sustainable growth.

Conclusion: Building Strong Communities

In the fast-paced world of crypto, it’s easy to get caught up in the rush for quick gains. But true success comes from building strong, engaged communities that believe in your project’s vision. By incentivizing influencers to invest rather than simply paying them to shill, you create a win-win scenario that benefits everyone involved. Sustainable growth always trumps short-term hype.

By understanding the risks and rewards of different promotional strategies, crypto projects can make smarter decisions that lead to lasting success. Let’s focus on building genuine communities and projects that stand the test of time.

--

--

Avacatx
Avacatx

Written by Avacatx

The feline face of avalanche blockchain

No responses yet